Methylene blue removal from aqueous solutions by electrocoagulation in continuous flow reactor: Modeling and optimization of operating parameters

Authors
Ali Jafari
Mansour Ghaderpoori
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of health and nutrition, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

The application and increasingly produce of colorants, particularly, synthetic dyes, are one of the main environmental and health concerns especially in industrialized countries. If this type of dyes is discharged into the environment without any control, many problems will arise. Therefore, it is necessary to remove the dyes from aqueous solutions using appropriate methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of the electrocoagulation process to remove methylene blue as one of the most widely used and problematic dyes from aqueous solution.

Methods & Materials

This study was conducted using a lab scale electrocoagulation reactor operating at a continuous flow. To better analyze and set the minimum reasonable number of experimental runs, the study was carried out using response surface methodology using the Box-Behnken model. For better understanding, the process, the effect of operating variables and their interactions on the process performance was also analyzed using the model. For this purpose, three independent parameters (at three levels) including current density (5, 7.5 and 10 mA/cm 2), dye concentration (50, 100 and 150 mg/L) and operating time (20, 60 and 100 min) were used.

Results

ANOVA test results showed that dye removal was affected by all independent variables and their interactions (P<0.05). In optimal conditions, in the range of the levels of the selected variables, the current density of 39.7 mA/cm2, dye concentration of 21.23 mg/l and reaction time of 86.47 min the removal of methylene blue obtained 99.16%.

Conclusion

This study showed that in the optimal operating conditions, the process can effectively remove the methylene blue dye. This method can be examined and considered for a real scale condition because of its simple application and affordable.
Keywords
dye
electrocoagulation
methylene blue
response surface methodology
1. Gulnaz O, Kaya A, Matyar F, Arikan B. Sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by activated sludge. J Hazard Mater 2004;108(3):183-8.
2. Rodríguez Couto S. Dye removal by immobilized fungi. Biotechnol Adv 2009;27(3):227-35.
3. Shedbalkar U, Dhanve R, Jadhav J. Biodegradation of triphenylmethane dye Cotton blue by Penicillium ochrochloron MTCC 517. J Hazard Mater 2008;157(2-3):472-9.
4. Annuar MSM, Adnan S, Vikineswary S, Chisti Y. Kinetics and energitics of azo dye decolorization by Pycnoporus sanguineus. Water Air Soil Pollut 2009;202(1-4):179-88.
5. Barragán BE, Costa C, Carmen Marquez M. Biodegradation of azo dyes by bacteria inoculated on solid media. Dyes and Pigments 2007;75(1):73-81.
6. dos Santos AB, Cervantes FJ, van Lier JB. Review paper on current technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: Perspectives for anaerobic biotechnology. Bioresour Technol 2007;98(12):2369-85.
7. Senthilkumaar S, Varadarajan PR, Porkodi K, Subbhuraam CV. Adsorption of methylene blue onto jute fiber carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 2005;284(1):78-82.
8. Ghosh D, Bhattacharyya K. Adsorption of Methylene blue on kaolinite. Appl Clay Sci 2002;20(6):295-300.
9. Órfão JJM, Silva AIM, Pereira JCV, Barata SA, Fonseca IM, PCC Faria, et al. Adsorption of reactive dyes on chemically modified activated carbons-Influence of pH. J Colloid Interface Sci 2006;296(2):480-9.
10. Tarasov VV, Barancova GS, Zaitsev NK, Dongxiang Z. Photochemical kinetics of organic dye oxidation in water. Process Saf Environ Prot 2003;81(4):243-9.
11. Ciardelli G, Corsi L, Marussi M. Membrane separation for wastewater reuse in the textile industry. Resource Conservation and Recycling 2001;31(2):189-97.
12. Yildiz YŞ. Optimization of Bomaplex Red CR-L dye removal from aqueous solution by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. J Hazard Mater 2008;153(1-2):194-200.
13. Lourenço ND, Novais JM, Pinheiro HM. Effect of some operational parameters on textile dye biodegradation in a sequential batch reactor. J Biotechnol 2001;89(2-3):163-74.
14. Inanloo K, Naddafi K, Mesdaghinia A, Nasseri S, Nodehi RN, Rahimi A. Optimization of operational parameters for decolorization and degradation of ci reactive blue 29 by ozone. Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2011;8(3):227-34
15. Ehrampoush M, Ghanizadeh G, Ghaneian M. Equilibrium and kinetics study of reactive red 123 dye removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on eggshell. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2011;8(2):101-6.
16. Holt PK, Barton GW, Wark M, Mitchell CA. A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2002;211(2-3):233-48.
17. Vik EA, Carlson DA, Eikum AS, Gjessing ET. Electrocoagulation of potable water. Water Res 1984;18(11):1355-60.
18. Pouet MF, Grasmick A. Urban wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation and flotation. Water Sci Technol 1995;31(3-4):275-83.
19. Ratna Kumar P, Chaudhari S, Khilar KC, Mahajan SP. Removal of arsenic from water by electrocoagulation. Chemosphere 2004;55(9):1245-52.
20. Jiang J-Q, Graham N, André C, Kelsall GH, Brandon N. Laboratory study of electro-coagulation-flotation for water treatment. Water Res 2002;36(16):4064-78.
21. Mills D. A new process for electrocoagulation. J Am Water Works Assoc 2000;92(6):34-43.
22. Daneshvar N, Ashassi Sorkhabi H, Kasiri MB. Decolorization of dye solution containing Acid Red 14 by electrocoagulation with a comparative investigation of different electrode connections. J Hazard Mater 2004;112(1-2):55-62.
23. Kim T-H, Park C, Shin E-B, Kim S. Decolorization of disperse and reactive dyes by continuous electrocoagulation process. Desalination 2002;150(2):165-75.
24. Hakizimana JN, Gourich B, Chafi M, Stiriba Y, Vial C, Drogui P, et al. Electrocoagulation process in water treatment: A review of electrocoagulation modeling approaches. Desalination 2017;404:1-21.
25. Koo N, Jo H-J, Lee S-H, Kim J-G. Using response surface methodology to assess the effects of iron and spent mushroom substrate on arsenic phytotoxicity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J Hazard Mater 2011;192(1):381-7.
26. Jain M, Garg VK, Kadirvelu K. Investigation of Cr(VI) adsorption onto chemically treated Helianthus annuus: Optimization using Response Surface Methodology. Bioresour Technol 2011;102(2):600-5.
27. Im J-K, Cho I-H, Kim S-K, Zoh K-D. Optimization of carbamazepine removal in O3/UV/H2O2 system using a response surface methodology with central composite design. Desalination 2012;285(31):306-14.
28. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandأ£o GC, et al. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta 2007;597(2):179-86.
29. Khayet M, Zahrim AY, Hilal N. Modelling and optimization of coagulation of highly concentrated industrial grade leather dye by response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal 2011;167(1):77-83.
30. Jafari A, Mahvi AH, Godini H, Rezaee R, Hosseini SS. Process optimization for fluoride removal from water by moringa oleifera seed extract. Fluoride 2014;47(2):152-60.
31. Jafari A, Rezaee R, Nasseri S, Mahvi AH, Maleki A, Safari M, et al. Application of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) for arsenic (v) removal from aqueous solutions and process optimization. J Dispers Sci Technol 2017;38(11):1588-93.
32. Mohsenibandpei A, Alinejad A, Bahrami H, Ghaderpoori M. Water Solution Polishing Of Nitrate Using Potassium Permanganate Modified Zeolite: Parametric Experiments, Kinetics And Equilibrium Analysis. Global Nest Journal 2016;18(3):546-58.
33. Mollah MYA, Pathak SR, Patil PK, Vayuvegula M, Agrawal TS, Gomes JAG, et al. Treatment of orange II azo-dye by electrocoagulation (EC) technique in a continuous flow cell using sacrificial iron electrodes. J Hazard Mater 2004;109(1-3):165-71.
34. Rezaee R, Maleki A, Jafari A, Mazloomi S, Zandsalimi Y, Mahvi AH. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of natural organic matter degradation by UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process. J Environ Health Sci Eng 2014;12(1):67.
35. Massoudinejad M, Ghaderpoori M, Shahsavani A, Amini MM. Adsorption of fluoride over a metal organic framework Uio-66 functionalized with amine groups and optimization with response surface methodology. J Mol Liq 2016;221:279-86.
36. Massoudinejad M, Ghaderpoori M, Shahsavani A, Jafari A, Kamarehie B, Ghaderpoury A, et al. Ethylenediamine-functionalized cubic ZIF-8 for arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution: Modeling, isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. J Mol Liq 2018;255:263-8.
37. Massoudinejad M, Shahsavani A, Kamarehie B, Jafari A, Ghaderpoori M, Amini MM, et al. Highly efficient adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solutions by metal organic frameworks: Modeling, isotherms, and kinetics. Fluoride 2018;51(4):355-65.
38. Chen G. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 2004;38(1):11-41.
39. Mollah MYA, Morkovsky P, Gomes JAG, Kesmez M, Parga J, Cocke DL. Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 2004;114(1-3):199-210.
40. Augugliaro V, Baiocchi C, Bianco Prevot A, García-López E, Loddo V, Malato S, et al. Azo-dyes photocatalytic degradation in aqueous suspension of TiO2 under solar irradiation. Chemosphere 2002;49(10):1223-30.
41. Golder AK, Hridaya N, Samanta AN, Ray S. Electrocoagulation of methylene blue and eosin yellowish using mild steel electrodes. J Hazard Mater 2005;127(1-3):134-40.
42. I. Ayhan S, Mahmut O. The decolorization of C.I. Reactive Black 5 in aqueous solution by electrocoagulation using sacrificial iron electrodes. J Hazard Mater 2009;161(2-3):1369-76.