Phenotypic evaluation of the prevalence of efflux pumps and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococcus aureus among burned patients

Authors
Abstract
Abstract

Introduction: The most common microorganisms that cause hospital infections in patients with burnsare Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Efflux pumps play a very important role in creating antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. This study aimed to investigate microbial resistance and phenotypic investigation of the efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients with burns.

Materials and methods: In this descriptive and cross-sectional study,45 swab samples were collected from the wounds of 2nd and 3rd degree burn patients at the Imam Ali (A.S.) Medical Center, burn department in Bojnord city over a period of 6 months. Biochemical tests were performed. The drug sensitivity pattern was done by the disk diffusion method, phenotypic tests, and acid test to detect the production of broad-spectrum beta-lactamase. Phenotypic investigation of efflux pump activity was done using the Cardwell method. Results: In the present study,20 wound samples of burn patients were infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 10 samples were infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus was resistant to ampicillin, penicillin and cefazolin 100% and cefotaxime, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, 70%, 80%, 90%, respectively, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was resistant to imipenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime, 85%, respectively. 65%, 55%, 85% were resistant. 60% Pseudomonas aeruginosa produced ESBL, 70% Staphylococcus aureus produced beta-lactamase. 75% and 70%. MDR isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus had efflux pumps.

Conclusion: The results showed that in the phenotypic more than 70% of MDR isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus have an efflux pump, so it is important to check the presence of this pump in proposing a suitable treatment model for patients infected with these bacteria.




Keywords

1. Mehla, J., et al., Predictive rules of efflux inhibition and avoidance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2021. 12(1): p. e02785-20.

2. Servatyari, K., H. Hamzehpour, and M.J.J.o.R.U.o.M.S. Rasouli, The prevalence and types of burn wound infection in the burn Ward of Tohid Hospital in Sanandaj in 2015: a short report. 2018. 16(9): p. 883-890.

3. Farzadfar, F., et al., Health system performance in Iran: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. 2022. 399(10335): p. 1625-1645.

4. Imani Fuladi, A., and Rostami, Z., and Shapouri, R, Antibiotic resistance and abundance of broad-spectrum beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, (1389). 3(37): p. 189-198.

5. Movagharnezhad, M.J.I.J.o.M.M., Identification and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Methicillin and Vancomycin Resistance from Patients in Sari and Ghaemshahr Injuries and Burn Hospitals in 2015. 2018. 12(3): p. 160-168.

6. Luan, W., et al., Inhibition of drug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus by efflux pump inhibitor and autolysis inducer to strengthen the antibacterial activity of β-lactam drugs. 2019. 68(4): p. 477.
7. Wang, D., et al., Inhibitory effects of silybin on the efflux pump of methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus. 2018. 18(1): p. 827-833.

8. Frempong-Manso, E., et al., Inability of a reserpine-based screen to identify strains overexpressing efflux pump genes in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. 2009. 33(4): p. 360-363.

9. Siriyong, T., et al., Conessine as a novel inhibitor of multidrug efflux pump systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2017. 17: p. 1-7.

10. Ugwuanyi, F.C., et al., Evaluation of efflux pump activity and biofilm formation in multidrug resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a Federal Medical Center in Nigeria. 2021. 20: p. 1-7.

11. Tafti, F.A., et al., Mutations in nalc gene of Mex AB-OprM efflux pump in carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds in Yazd, Iran. 2020. 12(1): p. 32.

12. Dey, D., et al., Antibiotic substrate selectivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexY and MexB efflux systems is determined by a Goldilocks affinity. 2020. 64(8): p. e00496-20.

13. Ebrahimi Sadabadi, Mahsa. Investigation of beta-lactamase production in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from patients in comparison with strains isolated from healthy carriers in Gorgan city. Graduate college of Department of Biology, Gorgan Branch , Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran -Summer 2016.

14. Evari Ehsan - Evaluation of phenotypic prevalence of efflux pumps and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in Gorgan city. Graduate college of Department of Biology, Gorgan Branch , Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran -Winter 2018.

15. Yahya Dashtizadeh, Ali Akbar Gerzin, Afaq Moatari, (2013). Evaluation of phenotypic and genetic prevalence of efflux pumps and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa among burn patients of Qutbuddin Shirazi Hospital, World of Microbs Quarterly, 7(2), 118-127

16. Aghayan, S.S., et al., The effects of berberine and palmatine on efflux pumps inhibition with different gene patterns in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn infections. 2017. 9(1): p. 2.

17. Hosseini, M., et al., Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Gram-Positive Isolates from Burn Patients in Velayat Burn Center in Rasht, North of Iran. 2021. 15(6): p. 52-57.

18. Baiomy, A.A., G.H. Shaker, and H.A.J.A.H.S. Abbas, Sensitizing multi drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from surgical site infections to antimicrobials by efflux pump inhibitors. 2020. 20(4): p. 1632.