طراحی و بهینه سازی فرمولاسیون پوستی ژل نیوزومال حاوی پاروکستین و ارزیابی درون تن جهت دارورسانی در درمان اختلال اضطرابی عمومی و اختلال ترس

نویسندگان
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان
چکیده
مقدمه: پاروکستین یکی از موثرترین مهارکننده‌های بازجذب سروتونین است که به دلیل متابولیسم عبور اول کبدی و تشدید اثرات نامطلوب ناشی از نوسانات غلظت با اشکالات قابل‌توجهی روبروست. دارورسانی ترانس درمال یکی از استراتژی‌های حذف عبور اول کبدی است که در آن استفاده از نیوزوم‌ها به دلیل افزایش قابل‌توجه نفوذ دارو موردتوجه قرارگرفته‌است.

روش: ژل نیوزومال بارگیری‌شده با پاروکستین براساس متغیرهای مختلف با استفاده از نرم‌افزار دیزاین اکسپرت (ورژن 7) طراحی و بهینه‌سازی‌شد. سپس مطالعات تکمیلی برون‌تن روی نیوزوم‌های بهینه انجام و دیسپرسیون این نیوزوم ها وارد پایه هیدروژل HPMC شد. در مرحله بعد، هیدروژل حاوی نیوزوم‌ها در مدل‌های حیوانی اختلالات اضطراب عمومی و هراس، به ترتیب با استفاده از maze elevated plus وmaze elevated-T بررسی‌شد.

یافتهها: فرمول بهینه دارای اندازه ذرات 28/05±417/0 نانومتر، توزیع اندازه ذره‌ای 0/06±0/31، پتانسیل زتا 0/42±12/80 میلی ولت، کارایی بارگیری 0/47±72/85 درصد و کارایی رهش 0/55 ± 71/94 درصد طی 4 ساعت بود. نتایج مطالعات حیوانی نشان‌داد که اثربخشی درمان با فرمولاسیون پیشنهادی به‌طور معنی‌داری (P<0.05) در مدل‌های حیوانی در مقایسه با گروه‌های دریافت‌کننده داروی آزاد و نرمال‌سالین بهبودیافت.

نتیجهگیری: عملکرد مناسب برون‌تن و درون‌تن هیدروژل حاوی نیوزوم‌های لودشده با پاروکستین این پتانسیل را نشان‌داد که به‌عنوان یک سیستم دارورسانی جایگزین برای فرم خوراکی جهت درمان اختلال اضطراب عمومی و هراس موردبررسی بیشتر قرارگیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Design and optimization of transdermal niosomal gel loaded with paroxetine for general anxiety and panic disorders

نویسندگان English

shiva masaeli
erfaneh ghassami
mohammed rabbani
isfahan university of medical sciences
چکیده English

Introduction: Paroxetine is an effective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, but its bioavailability is challenged by the to hepatic first pass effect, resulting in blood level fluctuations that negatively affect its therapeutic effects. Transdermal drug delivery could be used as a solution to this issue, and noisome are suggested as a solution to penetration enhancement of drugs at this point in administration.

Methods: In the current study, paroxetine-loaded niosomes were optimized for pharmaceutical characteristics Design Expert Software (ver.7) regarding the pharmaceutical characteristics. Then, the dispersion in HPMC hydrogel medium was dispersed, and the in vivo efficacy of this drug delivery system was investigated in animal models using elevated plus maze and elevated t-maze methods.

Results: The optimum formulation had a particle size of 417.40±28.05 nm, the particle size distribution of 0.31±, zeta potential of 12.8±0.42 mV, entrance efficiency of 72.85±0.47%, and release efficiency of 71.94±0.55%. Treatment of Bulb/c mice with this formulation via transdermal route of administration resulted in higher efficacy (p<0.05) compared with the positive and negative control groups.

Conclusion: The proposed formulation showed rather acceptable in vitro and in vivo efficacy, paving the ground for further investigation to choose drug products to substitute currently marketed ones.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Transdermal Drug Delivery
Noisome
Generalized anxiety disorder
Panic Disorder
1. Sapra A, Bhandari P, Sharma S, Chanpura T, Lopp L. Using Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2) and GAD-7 in a Primary Care Setting. Cureus. 2020 May 21;12(5):e8224.
2. Szuhany KL, Simon NM. Anxiety Disorders: A Review. JAMA. 2022;328(24):2431–2445.
3. Papola D, Miguel C, Mazzaglia M, et al. Psychotherapies for Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(3):250–259.
4. Mohammadi MR, Pourdehghan P, Mostafavi SA, Hooshyari Z, Ahmadi N, Khaleghi A. Generalized anxiety disorder: Prevalence, predictors, and comorbidity in children and adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2020; 73: 102234.
5. Strawn JR, Mills JA, Schroeder H, Mossman SA, Varney ST, Ramsey LB. Escitalopram in Adolescents With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry. 2020.
6. Hoffman DL, Dukes EM, Wittchen HU. Human and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder. Depression and anxiety. 2008;25(1):72-90.
7. Husky MM, Olfson M, He J-p, Nock MK, Swanson SA, Merikangas KR. Twelve-month suicidal symptoms and use of services among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Psychiatric services. 2012;63(10):989-96.
8. Nepon J, Belik SL, Bolton J, Sareen J. The relationship between anxiety disorders and suicide attempts: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Depression and anxiety. 2010;27(9):791-8.
9. Pine DS, Cohen P, Gurley D, Brook J, Ma Y. The risk for early-adulthood anxiety and depressive disorders in adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders. Archives of general psychiatry. 1998;55(1):56-64.
10. Strawn JR, Geracioti L, Rajdev N, Clemenza K, Levine A. Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: an evidence-based treatment review. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2018;19(10):1057-70.
11. Wittchen H-U, Hoyer J. Generalized anxiety disorder: nature and course. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2001;62:15-21.
12. Wittchen HU. Generalized anxiety disorder: prevalence, burden, and cost to society. Journal of Depression and anxiety. 2002;16(4):162-71.
13. Degeorge KC, Grover M, Streeter GS. Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder in Adults. Journal of Ameraicam Academi of Family Physician. 2022;106(2):157-164.
14. Ziffra M. Panic disorder: A review of treatment options. Annals Of Clinical Psychiatry 2021;33(1):e22-e31.
15. Chawla N, Anothaisintawee T, Charoenrungrueangchai K, Thaipisuttikul P, McKay G J, Attia J et al. Drug treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials BMJ 2022; 376 :e066084.
16. Zugliani MM, Cabo MC, Nardi AE, Perna G, Freire RC. Pharmacological and neuromodulatory treatments for panic disorder: clinical trials from 2010 to 2018. Psychiatry Investigation. 2019;16(1):50.
17. Davis BA, Nagarajan A, Forrest LR, Singh SK. Mechanism of paroxetine (paxil) inhibition of the serotonin transporter. Scientific reports. 2016;6(1):1-13.
18. Masson J, Sagne C, Hamon Me, El Mestikawy S. Neurotransmitter transporters in the central nervous system. Pharmacological reviews. 1999;51(3):439-64.
19. Delorme R, Betancur C, Wagner M, Krebs M-O, Gorwood P, Pearl P, et al. Support for the association between the rare functional variant I425V of the serotonin transporter gene and susceptibility to obsessive compulsive disorder. Molecular psychiatry. 2005;10(12):1059-61.
20. Hahn M, Blakely R. Monoamine transporter gene structure and polymorphisms in relation to psychiatric and other complex disorders. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2002;2(4):217-35.
21. Kristensen AS, Andersen J, Jørgensen TN, Sørensen L, Eriksen J, Loland CJ, et al. SLC6 neurotransmitter transporters: structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacological reviews. 2011;63(3):585-640.
22. Murphy DL, Lerner A, Rudnick G, Lesch K-P. Serotonin transporter: gene, genetic disorders, and pharmacogenetics. Molecular interventions. 2004;4(2):109.
23. Ozaki N, Goldman D, Kaye W, Plotnicov K, Greenberg B, Lappalainen J, et al. Serotonin transporter missense mutation associated with a complex neuropsychiatric phenotype. Molecular psychiatry. 2003;8(11):933-6.
24. Sutcliffe JS, Delahanty RJ, Prasad HC, McCauley JL, Han Q, Jiang L, et al. Allelic heterogeneity at the serotonin transporter locus (SLC6A4) confers susceptibility to autism and rigid-compulsive behaviors. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2005;77(2):265-79.
25. Veenstra-VanderWeele J, Muller CL, Iwamoto H, Sauer JE, Owens WA, Shah CR, et al. Autism gene variant causes hyperserotonemia, serotonin receptor hypersensitivity, social impairment and repetitive behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(14):5469-74.
26. Amara SG, Sonders MS. Neurotransmitter transporters as molecular targets for addictive drugs. Drug and Alcohol Dependence-Shannon. 1998;51(1):87-96.
27. Barker E, Blakely R. Norepinephrine and serotonin transporters: molecular targets of antidepressant drugs. Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. 1995;28:321-33.
28. Gupta AK, Verma P, Praharaj SK, Roy D, Singh A. Paroxetine overdose. Indian journal of psychiatry. 2005;47(3):167.
29. Knorr U, Kessing LV. The effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in healthy subjects. A systematic review. Nordic journal of psychiatry. 2010;64(3):153-63.
30. Azmin M, Florence A, Handjani‐Vila R, Stuart J, Vanlerberghe G, Whittaker J. The effect of non‐ionic surfactant vesicle (niosome) entrapment on the absorption and distribution of methotrexate in mice. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 1985;37(4):237-42.
31. Bragagni M, Mennini N, Ghelardini C, Mura P. Development and characterization of niosomal formulations of doxorubicin aimed at brain targeting. Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences. 2012;15(1):184-96.
32. Dufes C, Gaillard F, Uchegbu IF, Schätzlein AG, Olivier J-C, Muller J-M. Glucose-targeted niosomes deliver vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) to the brain. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2004;285(1-2):77-85.
33. Ingallina C, Rinaldi F, Bogni A, Ponti J, Passeri D, Reggente M, et al. Niosomal approach to brain delivery: Development, characterization and in vitro toxicological studies. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2016;511(2):969-82.
34. El-Nabarawi MA, Bendas ER, El Rehem RTA, Abary MY. Transdermal drug delivery of paroxetine through lipid-vesicular formulation to augment its bioavailability. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2013;443(1-2):307-17.
35. Fahmy AM, El-Setouhy DA, Ibrahim AB, Habib BA, Tayel SA, Bayoumi NA. Penetration enhancer-containing spanlastics (PECSs) for transdermal delivery of haloperidol: in vitro characterization, ex vivo permeation and in vivo biodistribution studies. Drug delivery. 2018;25(1):12-22.
36. Baker R. Understanding panic attacks and overcoming fear: Lion Books; 2011.
37. Wall P, Messier C. Methodological and conceptual issues in the use of the elevated plus-maze as a psychological measurement instrument of animal anxiety-like behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2001;25(3):275-86.
38. Moreira FA, Gobira PH, Viana TG, Vicente MA, Zangrossi H, Graeff FG. Modeling panic disorder in rodents. Cell and tissue research. 2013;354(1):119-25.
39. Gunasekara NS, Noble S, Benfield P. Paroxetine. Drugs. 1998;55(1):85-120.
40. Pervaiz F, Saba A, Yasin H, Buabeid M, Noreen S, Khan AK, et al. Fabrication of solid lipid nanoparticles-based patches of paroxetine and their ex-vivo permeation behaviour. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. 2023;51(1):108-19.
41. Barauskas J, Johnsson M, Tiberg F. Self-assembled lipid superstructures: beyond vesicles and liposomes. Nano letters. 2005;5(8):1615-9.
42. Hao S, Wang B, Wang Y, Xu Y. Enteric-coated sustained-release nanoparticles by coaxial electrospray: preparation, characterization, and in vitro evaluation. Journal of nanoparticle research. 2014;16:1-11.
43. Silva S, Bicker J, Fonseca C, Ferreira NR, Vitorino C, Alves G, et al. Encapsulated Escitalopram and paroxetine intranasal co-administration: In vitro/in vivo evaluation. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:751321.
44. Sammour RM, Taher M, Chatterjee B, Shahiwala A, Mahmood S. Optimization of aceclofenac proniosomes by using different carriers, part 1: Development and characterization. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(7):350.
45. Sezgin-Bayindir Z, Yuksel N. Investigation of formulation variables and excipient interaction on the production of niosomes. Aaps Pharmscitech. 2012;13:826-35..
46. El-Menshawe S. A novel approach to topical acetazolamide/PEG 400 ocular niosomes. Journal of drug delivery science and technology. 2012;22(4):295-9.
47. Hua W, Liu T. Preparation and properties of highly stable innocuous niosome in Span 80/PEG 400/H2O system. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2007;302(1-3):377-82.
48. Javani R, Hashemi FS, Ghanbarzadeh B, Hamishehkar H. Quercetin-loaded niosomal nanoparticles prepared by the thin-layer hydration method: Formulation development, colloidal stability, and structural properties. LWT. 2021;141:110865.
49. Liu T, Guo R, Hua W, Qiu J. Structure behaviors of hemoglobin in PEG 6000/Tween 80/Span 80/H2O niosome system. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2007;293(1-3):255-61.
50. Nahar S, Islam S, Khandaker S, Nasreen W, Hoque O, Dewan I. Formulation and evaluation of metoprolol tartrate loaded niosomes using 23 factorial design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2018;22(6):1-17.
51. Soliman SM, Abdelmalak NS, El-Gazayerly ON, Abdelaziz N. Novel non-ionic surfactant proniosomes for transdermal delivery of lacidipine: optimization using 23 factorial design and in vivo evaluation in rabbits. Drug delivery. 2016;23(5):1608-22.
52. Sadeghi S, Bakhshandeh H, Ahangari Cohan R, Peirovi A, Ehsani P, Norouzian D. Synergistic anti-staphylococcal activity of niosomal recombinant lysostaphin-LL-37. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2019:9777-92.
53. Nowroozi F, Almasi A, Javidi J, Haeri A, Dadashzadeh S. Effect of surfactant type, cholesterol content and various downsizing methods on the particle size of niosomes. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical Research: IJPR. 2018;17(Suppl2):1.
54. Taher SS, Al-Kinani KK, Hammoudi ZM, Ghareeb MM. Co-surfactant effect of polyethylene glycol 400 on microemulsion using BCS class II model drug. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2022;12(1):63-9.
55. Walf AA, Frye CA. The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nature protocols. 2007;2(2):322-8.
56. Amodeo LR, Greenfield VY, Humphrey DE, Varela V, Pipkin JA, Eaton SE, et al. Effects of acute or repeated paroxetine and fluoxetine treatment on affective behavior in male and female adolescent rats. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232(19):3515-28.
57. Graeff FG, Netto CF, Zangrossi Jr H. The elevated T-maze as an experimental model of anxiety. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1998;23(2):237-46.
58. Borsini F, Podhorna J, Marazziti D. Do animal models of anxiety predict anxiolytic-like effects of antidepressants? Psychopharmacology. 2002;163:121-41.