بررسی نقش شاخص‌های توسعه سلامت بر ناهمسانی رابطه نفرین منابع و توزیع درآمد در کشورهای منا: تحلیل فضایی پویا

نویسندگان
اکرم روزدار 1
مصطفی رجبی 2
فرزاد کریمی 3
1 دانشکده حقوق و اقتصاد، واحد خمینی شهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمینی شهر، اصفهان ، ایران.
2 ، واحد خمینی شهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمینی شهر، اصفهان ، ایران.
3 گروه مدیریت، واحد مبارکه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مبارکه، ایران.
چکیده
مقدمه: پدیده نفرین منابع به اثرات منفی و بازدارنده ناشی از وفور منابع طبیعی بر رشد اقتصادی در کشورهای غنی از منابع مطرح است. انتظار بر این است که در این کشورها با وفور منابع طبیعی، سرمایه­گذاری در شاخص­های سلامتی افزایش، تولید و رشد اقتصادی بهبود یابد و توزیع درآمدها عادلانه گردد. با این­حال، مطالعات تجربی حاکی از نتایج متفاوت در کشورهای در حال توسعه دارای منابع طبیعی بوده است. هدف از پژوهش بررسی تاثیر شاخص­های توسعه سلامت بر ناهمسانی رابطه نفرین منابع و توزیع درآمد، برآورد اثرات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم شاخص­های توسعه سلامت در کوتاه‌مدت و بلندمدت در قالب اقتصاد­سنجی فضایی با استفاده از ماتریس مجاورت وزنی فاصله­ای در بین15کشور خاورمیانه و شمال آفریقا (منا) در دوره زمانی1990 تا 2022 است.

روش: با استفاده از داده­های پانل و آپ­دیت نرم­افزار Stata17 و نصب پکیج­های جدید، الگوی پانل پویای فضایی به منظور الگوی سازگار با مبانی نظری انتخاب و با روش­شناسی الهورست مدل(spregfext) تصریح‌شد.

یافته‎ها: رانت منابع در کشورهای منطقه منا دارای تاثیر مثبت و معناداری بر توزیع درآمد در کوتاه­مدت، بلند­مدت و سریز مناطق دارد و فرضیه نفرین منابع در این مناطق تاییدمی‌شود. بهبود امید به زندگی در بدو تولد به عنوان شاخص­ موجودی توسعه سلامت کاهش نابرابری در این مناطق را به دنبال دارد؛ مخارج بهداشتی به عنوان شاخص سرمایه­گذاری توسعه سلامت در بلندمدت تاثیر معناداری بر توزیع درآمد در همان کشور و کشورهای مجاور خود دارد.

نتیجه‎گیری: کشورهای منطقه منا با اداره صحیح منابع و اصلاح زﻳﺮﺳـﺎﺧﺖ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ رانت منابع را کاهش دهند و با تخصیص بهینه بودجه در بخش سلامت، توزیع درآمدی در جامعه­ را گسترش دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
شاخص‌های توسعه سلامت
نفرین منابع
توزیع درآمد
اقتصادسنجی فضایی

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Role of Health Development Indicators on the Heterogeneity of the Relationship Between the Resource Curse and Income Distribution in MENA Countries: Dynamic Spatial Analysis

نویسندگان English

akram roozdar 1
mostafa rajabi 2
farzad karimi 3
1 Faculty of Law and Economics, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Isfahan, Iran.
2 , Department of Economics, Faculty of Law and Economics, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeinishahr, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Management, Mobarakeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: The phenomenon of the resource curse refers to the negative and inhibitory effects of the abundance of natural resources on economic growth in resource-rich countries. It is expected that in these countries, with the abundance of natural resources, investment in health indicators will increase, production and economic growth will improve, and income distribution will be fair. However, empirical studies have shown mixed results in developing countries with natural resources. The aim is to investigate the impact of health development indicators and resource rent on income distribution in the form of spatial econometrics using a distance-weighted proximity matrix among 15 countries in the (MANA) is in the period 1990 to 2022.

Methods: By using panel data updating Stata17 software and installing new packages, the spatial dynamic panel model was selected in order to be compatible with the theoretical foundations and specified with the Alhurst model (prefect) methodology.

Results: Resource rent in the MENA countries has a positive and significant impact on the distribution of income in the short term, long term, and over the regions, and the resource curse hypothesis is confirmed in these regions. Improving life expectancy at birth as an indicator of health development leads to a reduction in inequality in these regions; Health expenditure as an indicator of investment in health development in the long term has a significant impact on income distribution in the same country and its neighboring countries.

Conclusion: The countries of the MENA region should reduce resource rent by properly managing resources reforming the legal infrastructure, and expanding income distribution in society by optimally allocating budgets in the health sector.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Health Development Indicators
Resource Curse
Income Distribution
Spatial Econometrics
1. Meng B, Xue K, Han M. Digitalization, natural resources rents, and financial market risk: evidence from G7 countries. Resources Policy. 2022;79:103074
2. Rahim S, Murshed M, Umarbeyli S, Kirikkaleli D, Ahmad M, Tufail M, et al. Do natural resources abundance and human capital development promote economic growth? A study on the resource curse hypothesis in Next Eleven countries. Resources, Environment and Sustainability. 2021;4:100018.
3. Ben-Salha O, Dachraoui H, Sebri M. Natural resource rents and economic growth in the top resource-abundant countries: a PMG estimation. Resources Policy. 2021;74:101229.
4. Li Z, Wang J. The dynamic impact of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: evidence city-level empirical data in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;351:131570.
5. Su C-W, Khan K, Tao R, Umar M. A review of resource curse burden on inflation in Venezuela. Energy. 2020;204:117925.
6. Anyanwu UM, Anyanwu AA, Cieślik A. Does abundant natural resources amplify the negative impact of income inequality on economic growth? Resources Policy. 2021;74:102229
7. Gylfason T. Natural resources and economic growth: From dependence to diversification. Economic liberalization and integration policy: Options for Eastern Europe and Russia. 2006:201-31.
8. Wang X, Wang Y, Wei C. The impact of natural resource abundance on green economic growth in the belt and road countries: The role of institutional quality. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2023;98:106977.
9. Singh S, Sharma GD, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Bansal P. Do natural resources impact economic growth: An investigation of P5+ 1 countries under sustainable management. Geoscience Frontiers. 2024;15(3):101595.
10. Zhou R, Abbasi KR, Salem S, Almulhim AI, Alvarado R. Do natural resources, economic growth, human capital, and urbanization affect the ecological footprint? A modified dynamic ARDL and KRLS approach. Resources Policy. 2022;78:102782.
11. Behzadan N, Chisik R, Onder H, Battaile B. Does inequality drive the Dutch disease? Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics. 2017;106:104-18..
12. Kim D-H, Lin S-C. Oil abundance and income inequality. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2018;71:825-48.
13. Guo Y, Wong W-K, Su N, Ghardallou W, Gavilán JCO, Uyen PTM, et al. Resource curse hypothesis and economic growth: A global analysis using bootstrapped panel quantile regression analysis. Resources Policy. 2023;85:103790.
14. Adabor O, Mishra A. The resource curse paradox: The role of financial inclusion in mitigating the adverse effect of natural resource rent on economic growth in Ghana. Resources Policy. 2023;85:103810
15. Gylfason T. Natural resources, education, and economic development. European Economic Review. 2001;45(4-6):847-59
16. Davis GA. Large-sample evidence of income inequality in resource-rich nations. Mineral Economics. 2020;33(1):193-216.
17. Alvarado R, Cuesta L, Kumar P, Rehman A, Murshed M, Işık C, et al. Impact of natural resources on economic progress: evidence for trading blocs in Latin America using non-linear econometric methods. Resources Policy. 2022;79:102908.
18. Tadadjeu S, Njangang H, Asongu S, Nounamo Y. Natural resources and wealth inequality: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2023;39(3):596-608.
19. Venables AJ. Using natural resources for development: why has it proven so difficult? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2016;30(1):161-84.
20. Gupta S, Verhoeven M, Tiongson ER. Public spending on health care and the poor. Health economics. 2003;12(8):685-96.
21. de la Escosura LP. Health, income, and the preston curve: A long view. Economics & Human Biology. 2023;48:101212.
22. Gemicioğlu S, Soyhan S, Mollavelioğlu MŞ. Do natural resources lead to a curse or blessing in terms of income inequality? Resources Policy. 2024;88:104513.
23. Fahlevi M, Ahmad M, Balbaa ME, Wu T, Aljuaid M. The efficiency of petroleum and government health services to benefit life expectancy during the inefficiencies of hydroelectricity consumption. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2023;19:100289.
24. Oduyemi GO, Owoeye T, Adekoya OB. Health outcomes and the resource curse paradox: The experience of African oil-rich countries. Resources Policy. 2021;73:102201
25. Cockx L, Francken N. Extending the concept of the resource curse: Natural resources and public spending on health. Ecological Economics. 2014;108:136-49.
26. Sadeghi Amroabadi, B. Analyzing the Asymmetric Cumulative Effects of Rentier State on Income Inequality in Mena Countrie. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 2022; 9(3): 113-146. doi: 10.22034/ecoj.2022.42390.274826.[In Persian]
27. khezri m, mohammadi p. Dependence on Natural Resources and its Effects on Health Indicator in Iran Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies. 2021;29(98):389-416. doi: ‎ 10.52547/qjerp.29.98.389.[In Persian]
28. Murray CJ. Summary measures of population health: concepts, ethics, measurement and applications: World Health Organization; 2002.
29. Nejad C, Azadeh, Khandan G. The effect of positive and negative public health expenditure shocks during commercial periods on health status in Iran. Health management. 2023;13(4):87-102. [In Persian]
30. Apergis N, Ben Ali MS. Corruption, Rentier States and Economic Growth Where Do the GCC Countries Stand? Economic Development in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: From Rentier States to Diversified Economies. 2020:111-23.
31. Pi J, Fan Y. Insecure resources, rent seeking, and wage inequality. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2019;61:260-9.
32. Luo W, Xie Y. Economic growth, income inequality and life expectancy in China. Social science & medicine. 2020;256:113046.
33. Amin Rashti N, Asghari L. Investigating the role of health costs on income distribution in Iran. Financial economics (financial economics and development) [Internet]. 1390;5(16):135-159. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/229107/fa [In Persian]
34. Alamanda A. The effect of government expenditure on income inequality and poverty in Indonesia. Info Artha. 2020;4(1):1-11.
35. Ramazanpoor, E., Sedaghat Kalmarzi, H. The Effect of Combined Government Expenditure on Income Inequality Regimes in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 2021; 8(3): 243-266. doi: 10.22034/ecoj.2021.45362.2855 [In Persian].