سلولز باکتریایی پوشیده شده با ژلاتین، داربستی برای مهندسی بافت قلب

1. Courtenay JC, Johns MA, Galembeck F, Deneke C, Lanzoni EM, Costa CA, et al. Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering. Cellulose. 2017;24(1):253–67.
2. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24(24):4337–51.
3. Jawad H, Lyon AR, Harding SE, Ali NN, Boccaccini AR. Myocardial tissue engineering. British Medical Bulletin. 2008;87(1):31–47.
4. Ma PX. Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Materials Today [Internet]. 2004;7(5):30–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00233-0
5. Arai K, Kitsuka T, Nakayama K. Scaffold-based and scaffold-free cardiac constructs for drug testing. Biofabrication. 2021;13(4).
6. Kaiser NJ, Kant RJ, Minor AJ, Coulombe KLK. Optimizing blended collagen-fibrin hydrogels for cardiac tissue engineering with human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering. 2019;5(2):887–99.
7. Riaud M, Martinez MC, Montero-Menei CN. Scaffolds and extracellular vesicles as a promising approach for cardiac regeneration after myocardial infarction. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(12):1–23.
8. Tajabadi M, Goran Orimi H, Ramzgouyan MR, Nemati A, Deravi N, Beheshtizadeh N, et al. Regenerative strategies for the consequences of myocardial infarction: Chronological indication and upcoming visions. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy [Internet]. 2022;146(December 2021):112584. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112584
9. Reis LA, Chiu LLY, Liang Y, Hyunh K, Momen A, Radisic M. Acta Biomaterialia A peptide-modified chitosan – collagen hydrogel for cardiac cell culture and delivery. Acta Biomaterialia [Internet]. 2012;8(3):1022–36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.030
10. Domenech M, Ph D, Polo-corrales L, Ph D, Ramirez-vick JE, Ph D. Tissue Engineering Strategies for Myocardial Regeneration : Acellular vs Cellular Scaffolds ? :1–70.
11. Cetin Y, Sahin MG, Kok FN. Application potential of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffold using mesenchymal stem cells for cardiac regeneration. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2021;36(4):740–53.
12. Haroglu D, Eken A, Gönen ZB, Bahar D. Development of a three dimensional (3D) knitted scaffold for myocardial tissue engineering. Part II: biological performance of the knitted scaffolds. Journal of the Textile Institute. 2021;
13. Li J, Zhao Y, Zhu W. Targeting angiogenesis in myocardial infarction: Novel therapeutics (Review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2021;23(1).
14. Venugopal JR, Prabhakaran MP, Mukherjee S, Ravichandran R, Dan K, Ramakrishna S. Biomaterial strategies for alleviation of myocardial infarction. Journal of the Royal society interface. 2012;9(66):1–19.
15. Ye S, Jiang L, Su C, Zhu Z, Wen Y, Shao W. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Development of gelatin / bacterial cellulose composite sponges as potential natural wound dressings. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules [Internet]. 2019;133:148–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.095
16. Jae YJ, Joong KP, Ho NC. Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii in an agitated culture without living non-cellulose producing cells. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2005;37(3):347–54.
17. Entcheva E, Bien H, Yin L, Chung CY, Farrell M, Kostov Y. Functional cardiac cell constructs on cellulose-based scaffolding. Biomaterials. 2004;25(26):5753–62.
18. Müller FA, Müller L, Hofmann I, Greil P, Wenzel MM, Staudenmaier R. Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(21):3955–63.
19. Wang B, Lv X, Chen S, Li Z, Yao J, Peng X, et al. Use of heparinized bacterial cellulose based scaffold for improving angiogenesis in tissue regeneration. Carbohydrate Polymers [Internet]. 2018;181(March 2017):948–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.055
20. Ahrem H, Pretzel D, Endres M, Conrad D, Courseau J, Müller H, et al. Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomaterialia [Internet]. 2014;10(3):1341–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.004
21. Martínez Ávila H, Schwarz S, Feldmann EM, Mantas A, Von Bomhard A, Gatenholm P, et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014;98(17):7423–35.
22. Lee SH, Lim YM, Jeong SI, An SJ, Kang SS, Jeong CM, et al. The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2015;7(6):484–95.
23. Leor J, Amsalem Y, Cohen S. Cells , scaffolds , and molecules for myocardial tissue engineering. 2005;105:151–63.
24. M. Cakmak A, Unal S, Sahin A, N. Oktar F, Sengor M, Ekren N, et al. 3D Printed Polycaprolactone/Gelatin/Bacterial Cellulose/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers. 2020;12(1962):14.
25. Andrade FK, Moreira SMG, Domingues L, Gama FMP. Improving the affinity of fibroblasts for bacterial cellulose using carbohydrate-binding modules fused to RGD. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A. 2010;92(1):9–17.
26. Mccain ML, Agarwal A, Nesmith HW, Nesmith AP, Parker KK. Micromolded Gelatin Hydrogels for Extended Culture of Engineered Cardiac Tissues. Biomaterials. 2015;35(21):5462–71.
27. Swingler S, Gupta A, Gibson H, Kowalczuk M, Heaselgrave W, Radecka I. Recent advances and applications of bacterial cellulose in biomedicine. Polymers. 2021;13(3):1–29.
28. Taokaew S, Seetabhawang S, Siripong P, Phisalaphong M. Biosynthesis and characterization of nanocellulose-gelatin films. Materials. 2013;6(3):782–94.
29. Kirdponpattara S, Phisalaphong M, Kongruang S. Gelatin-bacterial cellulose composite sponges thermally cross-linked with glucose for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydrate Polymers [Internet]. 2017;177(August):361–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.094
30. Nakayama A, Kakugo A, Gong JP, Osada Y, Takai M, Erata T, et al. High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Advanced Functional Materials. 2004;14(11):1124–8.
31. Palaninathan V, Raveendran S, Rochani AK, Chauhan N, Sakamoto Y, Ukai T, et al. Bioactive bacterial cellulose sulfate electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2018;12(7):1634–45.
32. Mihardja SS, Gonzales JA, Gao D, Sievers RE, Fang Q, Stillson CA, et al. Biomaterials The effect of a peptide-modi fi ed thermo-reversible methylcellulose on wound healing and LV function in a chronic myocardial infarction rodent model. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2013;34(35):8869–77. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.028
33. Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP. Gluconacetobacter sacchari: An efficient bacterial cellulose cell-factory. Carbohydrate Polymers [Internet]. 2011;86(3):1417–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.046
34. Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A. Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015;117:518–23.
35. Salari M, Sowti Khiabani M, Rezaei Mokarram R, Ghanbarzadeh B, Samadi Kafil H. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from bacterial cellulose produced in sugar beet molasses and cheese whey media. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules [Internet]. 2019;122:280–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.136
36. Jose Gouveia P, Rosa S, Ricotti L, Abecasis B, Almeida H V, Monteiro L, et al. Flexible nanofilms coated with aligned piezoelectric microfiber preserve the contractility of cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials. 2017;139(May):213–28.
37. Khan S, Ul-islam M, Wajid M, Israr M, Jang JH, Kong PJ. Nano-gold assisted highly conducting and biocompatible bacterial cellulose-PEDOT:PSS films for biology-device interface applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules [Internet]. 2017;107(September):865–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.064
38. Ran J, Jiang P, Liu S, Sun G, Yan P, Shen X, et al. Constructing multi-component organic / inorganic composite bacterial cellulose-gelatin / hydroxyapatite double-network scaffold platform for stem cell-mediated bone tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering C [Internet]. 2017;78(April 12):130–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.062
39. Qiao H, Guo T, Zheng Y, Zhao L, Sun Y, Liu Y, et al. A novel microporous oxidized bacterial cellulose/arginine composite and its effect on behavior of fibroblast/endothelial cell. Carbohydrate Polymers [Internet]. 2018;184(July 2018):323–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.026
40. Gutiérrez-Hernández JM, Escobar-García DM, Escalante A, Flores H, González FJ, Gatenholm P, et al. In vitro evaluation of osteoblastic cells on bacterial cellulose modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes as scaffold for bone regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering C [Internet]. 2017;75:445–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.074
41. Neshati Z, Schalij MJ, De Vries AAF. The proarrhythmic features of pathological cardiac hypertrophy in neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocyte cultures. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2020;128(3):545–53.
42. Lei Q, He J, Li D. Electrohydrodynamic 3D Printing of Layer-specifically Oriented, Multiscale Conductive Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Nanoscale. 2019;11(32):15195–205.
43. Sun H, Zhou J, Huang Z, Qu L, Lin N, Liang C, et al. Carbon nanotube-incorporated collagen hydrogels improve cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;12:3109–20.
44. Tao ZW, Mohamed M, Hogan M, Gutierrez L, Birla RK. Optimizing a spontaneously contracting heart tissue patch with rat neonatal cardiac cells on fibrin gel. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2017;11(1):153–63.
45. Chiaoprakobkij N, Seetabhawang S, Sanchavanakit N, Phisalaphong M. Fabrication and characterization of novel bacterial cellulose / alginate / gelatin biocomposite film. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition [Internet]. 2019;30(11):961–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2019.1613292
46. Zhukova Y, Hiepen C, Knaus P, Osterland M, Prohaska S, Dunlop JWC, et al. The role of titanium surface nanostructuring on preosteoblast morphology , adhesion , and migration. Advanced Functional Materials. 2017;1601244:1–13.
47. Sanzari I, Dinelli F, Humphrey E. Microstructured hybrid scaffolds for aligning neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Materials Science & Engineering C [Internet]. 2019;109783. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109783
48. Ashrafi Z, Lucia L, Krause W. Bioengineering tunable porosity in bacterial nanocellulose matrices. Soft matter. 2019;15(45):9359–67.
49. Davidenko N, Schuster CF, Bax D V, Farndale RW, Hamaia S, Best SM, et al. Evaluation of cell binding to collagen and gelatin : a study of the effect of 2D and 3D architecture and surface chemistry. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine [Internet]. 2016;0–1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5763-9
50. Chen Y, Zhou X, Lin Q. Bacterial cellulose / gelatin composites: in situ preparation and glutaraldehyde treatment. Cellulose. 2014;21(August):2679–2693.
51. Chhavi S, K BN, Puneet P. Ternary nano-biocomposite films using synergistic combination of bacterial cellulose with chitosan and gelatin for tissue engineering applications. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition [Internet]. 2020;32(2):166–88. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1822122
52. Mirtaghavi A, Baldwin A, Tanideh N, Zarei M, Muthuraj R, Cao Y, et al. Crosslinked porous three-dimensional cellulose nanofibers-gelatine biocomposite scaffolds for tissue regeneration. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;164:1949–59.
53. Flaig F, Rago H, Simon A, Revet G, Kitsara M, Kitasato L, et al. Design of functional electrospun scaffolds based on poly (glycerol sebacate) elastomer and poly (lactic acid) for cardiac tissue engineering. ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering. 2020;6(4):2388–400.
54. Vatankhah E, Prabhakaran MP, Jin G, Mobarakeh LG, Ramakrishna S. Development of nanofibrous cellulose acetate/gelatin skin substitutes for variety wound treatment applications. Journal of biomaterials applications. 2014;28(6):909–21.
55. D. Dozois M, C. Bahlmann L, Zilberman Y, Tang X (Shirley). Carbon nanomaterial-enhanced scaffolds for the creation of cardiac tissue constructs: a new frontier in cardiac tissue engineering. Carbon [Internet]. 2017;338–49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.050
56. Fernandes M, Gama M, Pedro Souto A, Dourado F. Development of novel bacterial cellulose composites for the textile and shoe industry. Microbial biotechnology. 2019;12(4):650–61.
57. Li G, Nandgaonkar AG, Wang Q, Zhang J, Krause WE, Wei Q, et al. Laccase-immobilized bacterial cellulose / TiO 2 functionalized composite membranes : Evaluation for photo- and bio-catalytic dye degradation. Journal of Membrane Science [Internet]. 2017;525(November 2016):89–98. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.033
58. Treesuppharat W, Rojanapanthu P, Siangsanoh C, Manuspiya H, Ummartyotin S. Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose and gelatin-based hydrogel composites for drug-delivery systems. Biotechnology Reports [Internet]. 2017;15(March):84–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.07.002
59. Scopelliti PE, Borgonovo A, Indrieri M, Giorgetti L, Milani P, Carbone R, et al. The effect of surface nanometre-scale morphology on protein adsorption. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(7):1–9.
60. Rechendorff K, Hovgaard MB, Foss M, Zhdanov VP, Besenbacher F. Enhancement of protein adsorption induced by surface roughness. Langmuir [Internet]. 2006;22:10885–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/la0621923
61. Chiaoprakobkij N, Suwanmajo T, Sanchavanakit N, Phisalaphong M. Curcumin-Loaded Bacterial Cellulose / Alginate / Gelatin as a multifunctional biopolymer composite film. Molecules [Internet]. 2020;25(17):3800. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173800
62. Zhao G, Zhang X, Li B, Huang G, Xu F, Zhang X. Solvent-free fabrication of carbon nanotube/silk fibroin electrospun matrices for enhancing cardiomyocyte functionalities. ACS Biomaterials science & engineering. 2020;(February 3):1630–40.
63. Ye D, Yang P, Lei X, Zhang D, Li L, Chang C, et al. Robust anisotropic cellulose hydrogels fabricated via strong self- robust anisotropic cellulose hydrogels fabricated via strong self-aggregation forces for cardiomyocytes unidirectional growth. Chemistery of materials. 2018;30(15):5175–5183.
64. Onódi Z, Visnovitz T, Kiss B, Hambalkó S, Koncz A, Ágg B, et al. Systematic transcriptomic and phenotypic characterization of human and murine cardiac myocyte cell lines and primary cardiomyocytes reveals serious limitations and low resemblances to adult cardiac phenotype. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2022;165(November 2021):19–30.
65. Kuznetsov A V., Javadov S, Sickinger S, Frotschnig S, Grimm M. H9c2 and HL-1 cells demonstrate distinct features of energy metabolism, mitochondrial function and sensitivity to hypoxia-reoxygenation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research [Internet]. 2015;1853(2):276–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.11.015
66. Watkins SJ, Borthwick GM, Arthur HM. The H9C2 cell line and primary neonatal cardiomyocyte cells show similar hypertrophic responses in vitro. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Animal. 2011;47(2):125–31.
67. Ehler E, Moore-morris T, Lange S. Isolation and Culture of Neonatal Mouse Cardiomyocytes. 2013;(September):1–10.